Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Natalija Senic vs Virginia Ferrara Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Senic vs Ferrara analysis and find out who is favored!
Natalija Senic vs Virginia Ferrara Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Senic 0 - 0 Ferrara
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Senic has won 50.37% of points on their second serve, while Ferrara has won 38.64%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Senic, in recent form, has won 60.13% of their opponent's second serve points, while Ferrara has won 58.13%. The same stats for first serve returns are 44.97% and 43.05% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Senic has saved 59.73% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Ferrara has saved 50% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Senic has won 70.49% of matches played (W/L 43/ 18), with Ferrara winning 47.62% (W/L 20/ 22) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Senic has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 71% (W/L 104/ 43), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Ferrara has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 58% (W/L 48/ 35), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 46% (W/L 6/ 7).
- Player level: In the last year, Senic has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 73.33% of matches (W/L 33/ 12), where as Ferrara has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 52.38% of matches (W/L 11/ 10). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Senic has played against opponents with an average rank of 78 while Ferrara has played against players with an average rank of 228.64.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Senic has won 46% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Ferrara has won 62% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Senic has converted 56.77% of breakpoint opportunities, and Ferrara has converted 45.79% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
579
Rank
579
High
21
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
839
Rank
821
High
20
Age
Plays
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
Form
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
L
70% (104-45)
Career Total W/L
56% (66-51)
67% (16-8)
YTD W/L
55% (11-9)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Natalija Senic | Virginia Ferrara |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 67% (16/8) | 55% (11/9) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 71% (37/15) | 51% (24/23) |
| Games Win/Loss | 59% (273/191) | 52% (228/212) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 60% (3/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 70% (16/7) | 50% (6/6) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/1) | 67% (2/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.15 | 0.07 |
| Aces Total | 34 | 16 |
| DFs per game | 0.17 | 0.43 |
| DFs Total | 39 | 92 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:41:30 | 1:36:18 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 69.92 | 324.1 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (902/1488) | 67% (787/1183) |
| 1st Serve W% | 61% (548/902) | 60% (469/787) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 51% (299/586) | 39% (153/396) |
| BPs Won% Total | 58% (114/198) | 46% (87/190) |
| Return Pts W% | 50% (729/1449) | 49% (611/1247) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 67% (6/3) | 50% (4/4) |
| Futures W/L | 67% (10/5) | 58% (7/5) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 70% (16/23) | 55% (11/20) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 43% (3/7) | 0% (0/4) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/5) | 71% (5/7) |
| 1st set W, W | 80% (20/16) | 100% (7/7) |
| 1st set W, L | 20% (20/4) | 0% (7/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (4/0) | 31% (13/4) |
Natalija Senic Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats 
Caijsa Wilda Hennemann
Player
Natalija Senic
76%
(
45 of
59)
1st Serve %
61%
(
30 of
49)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
36%
(
21 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
26 of
49)
64
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Natalija Senic
Player
Suana Tucakovic
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve %
42%
(
19 of
45)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
64%
(
21 of
33)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
41%
(
22 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
58
Total Points Won
41
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Natalija Senic
Player
Petra Konjikusic
58%
(
47 of
81)
1st Serve %
53%
(
37 of
70)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
1
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
62%
(
21 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
8)
32%
(
26 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
29 of
70)
84
Total Points Won
67
|
6-2 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
| SF |
Stats
Sara Cakarevic
Player
Natalija Senic
72%
(
84 of
117)
1st Serve %
70%
(
101 of
144)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
60%
(
50 of
84)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
50 of
101)
42%
(
14 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
40%
(
8 of
20)
Break Points Won
78%
(
7 of
9)
45%
(
53 of
117)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
70 of
144)
134
Total Points Won
127
|
6-7(5) 6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Natalija Senic
Player
Nina Stojanovic
57%
(
25 of
44)
1st Serve %
57%
(
44 of
77)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
6
68%
(
17 of
25)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
11 of
33)
35%
(
6 of
17)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
36%
(
16 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
40 of
77)
68
Total Points Won
53
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Natalija Senic
Player
Ekaterina Ovcharenko
55%
(
41 of
74)
1st Serve %
62%
(
37 of
60)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
5
66%
(
27 of
41)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
41%
(
30 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
30 of
60)
74
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Natalija Senic
Player
Dunja Maric
59%
(
22 of
37)
1st Serve %
45%
(
25 of
55)
1
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
5
82%
(
18 of
22)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
9 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
30 of
55)
58
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Anja Stankovic
Player
Natalija Senic
50%
(
43 of
86)
1st Serve %
74%
(
62 of
84)
2
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
4
58%
(
25 of
43)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
33 of
62)
49%
(
21 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
47%
(
40 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
42 of
84)
88
Total Points Won
82
|
4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Natalija Senic
Player
Alexandra Vasilyeva
50%
(
11 of
22)
1st Serve %
73%
(
19 of
26)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
82%
(
9 of
11)
1st Serve Won
16%
(
3 of
19)
73%
(
8 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
23%
(
5 of
22)
Rtn Points Won
81%
(
21 of
26)
38
Total Points Won
10
|
6-0 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Virginia Ferrara Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Angelica Raggi
Player
Virginia Ferrara
72%
(
42 of
58)
1st Serve %
72%
(
34 of
47)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
3
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
9)
33%
(
19 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
64
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ioana Zvonaru
Player
Virginia Ferrara
45%
(
36 of
80)
1st Serve %
68%
(
49 of
72)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
6
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
33 of
49)
59%
(
26 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
27 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
30 of
72)
83
Total Points Won
69
|
6-3 7-6(0) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Virginia Ferrara
Player
Elena Milovanovic
63%
(
50 of
80)
1st Serve %
64%
(
37 of
58)
3
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
4
62%
(
31 of
50)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
44%
(
35 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
34 of
58)
79
Total Points Won
59
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Virginia Ferrara
Player
Ines Ibbou
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve %
69%
(
35 of
51)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
56%
(
18 of
32)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
76%
(
13 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
37%
(
18 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
30 of
51)
61
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Andreea Prisacariu
Player
Virginia Ferrara
68%
(
56 of
82)
1st Serve %
59%
(
56 of
95)
0
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
3
52%
(
29 of
56)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
13 of
39)
64%
(
9 of
14)
Break Points Won
70%
(
7 of
10)
50%
(
41 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
53 of
95)
94
Total Points Won
83
|
6-4 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Virginia Ferrara
Player
Ekaterina Ovcharenko
65%
(
58 of
89)
1st Serve %
68%
(
65 of
95)
1
Aces
4
7
Double Faults
6
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
37 of
65)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
38%
(
34 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
44 of
95)
99
Total Points Won
85
|
6-7(5) 7-5 10-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-0 6-4 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Anja Stankovic
Player
Virginia Ferrara
47%
(
48 of
103)
1st Serve %
67%
(
48 of
72)
5
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
3
60%
(
29 of
48)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
23 of
48)
51%
(
28 of
55)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
15 of
24)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
20%
(
4 of
20)
45%
(
46 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
72)
91
Total Points Won
84
|
6-1 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Virginia Ferrara
Player
Grete Gull
77%
(
50 of
65)
1st Serve %
61%
(
38 of
62)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
5
48%
(
24 of
50)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
15 of
38)
33%
(
5 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
75%
(
9 of
12)
Break Points Won
64%
(
7 of
11)
55%
(
36 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
40 of
62)
69
Total Points Won
58
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Virginia Ferrara
Player
Ana Giraldi Requena
73%
(
81 of
111)
1st Serve %
61%
(
67 of
109)
-
Aces
-
7
Double Faults
14
57%
(
46 of
81)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
40 of
67)
33%
(
10 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
9 of
42)
53%
(
10 of
19)
Break Points Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
50%
(
55 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
60 of
109)
116
Total Points Won
104
|
5-7 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Senic Vs Ferrara Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Senic are available here and Ferrara photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
